Updated history on drones & DARPA’s Angry Drones Game!

January 11 2012 by Editor in Drones, Electronic Harassment, General, Mind Control, New Technologies |No Comments

In the past few years we have been enlightened by a lot of drone news. The evidence of their deployment for surveillance of civilian populations, their world wide location and some of their capabilities were known through documented examples of real life applications. Drones were also hacked with equipment available for just a few dollars, taken over and misdirected to a different “target”, they have also crashed and assassinated. These were some of the headlines:

  • “Insurgents Hack U.S. Drones”
  • “Drone Incident Highlights U.S. Efforts Against Iran”
  • “Seychelles becomes site of another US drone crash”
  • “North Dakota Uses Predator Drone to Bust Family for “Taking” 6 Cows”

A little history on drones
For those of us who know, those news are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the underlying operations for which most drones are used, under the cover of blue skies the world of Nikola Tesla comes back to haunt us…
The first documented idea of using drones in the way they are used today can probably be attributed to Nikola Tesla, in his view it would be how future wars would be fought.
In the late 1960’s Project Aquiline involved some of the first remote controlled aircraft experiments that would later become the drones that are operating around the world today. It was a six-foot remote controlled drone designed to look like an eagle or buzzard in flight. It was equipped with a television camera, sensors and other electronic surveillance equipment. The project began as an attempt to investigate a mysterious watercraft the Soviet Union had constructed and was spotted testing, by satellite reconnaissance on the Caspian Sea. It was later nicknamed the Caspian Monster.
This project remains classified, although a British documentary uncovered that the target for the Aquiline drone might have been a Soviet hydrofoil called Ekranopian. The Aquiline drone was designed to track in on its target following established communication lines in foreign countries, and would be launched from submarines. The drone built and tested crash landed often and the CIA eventually canceled the program.
Another attempt by the CIA to develop this technology was Project Ornithopter which involved a birdlike drone designed to blend in with nature by flapping its wings. Then another even smaller drone was designed to look like a crow that would land on window ledges and photograph, through the window, what was going on inside the building. Insectothopter took the concept to an even smaller animal, a drone designed to look like a dragonfly. Insectothopter was a green drone that flapped wings powered by miniature gas engines.
The CIA also used actual animals to do surveillance, including pigeons with “pigeon-cams” attached to their necks and Project Acoustic Kitty, which placed acoustic listening devices on household cats. Another point I wanted to get across is that it is also well documented through history the use of animals in such a way through the power of the mind and the gifts that some people might poses.

Some of what is publicly known
The U.S. first said it used targeted killing in November 2002, with the cooperation and approval of the government of Yemen.

  • There is a list of targets whose capture or death had been called for by US President George W. Bush. Among those a CIA-controlled Predator drone fired a Hellfire missile at an SUV in the Yemeni desert containing Qaed Salim Sinan al-Harethi, a Yemeni suspected senior al-Qaeda lieutenant, in addition to al-Harethi, five other occupants of the SUV were killed, all of whom were suspected al-Qaeda terrorists, and one of whom (Kamal Derwish) was an American.
  • In May 2010 an errant US drone attack targeting al Qaeda terrorists in Wadi Abida, Yemen, killed five people, among them Jaber al-Shabwani, deputy governor of Maarib province who was mediating between the government and the militants.
  • On May 5, 2011, a missile fired from a U.S. drone killed Abdullah and Mosaad Mubarak, brothers who may have been militants. The missile was fired on their car and both died instantly. The strike was aimed at killing Anwar al-Awlaki, but al-Awlaki appears to have survived.
  • Air strikes intensified in Yemen’s territory during 2011 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_Yemen#US_air_attacks)

Real life, remote control assassinations from a list with “errant” and non errant drones? Admitted publicly since 9-2002 under the flag of the war against terror, a direct consequence of 9-11. What followed was total deployment of yet another technological layer of surveillance and harassment against human beings.
In 2009 some were surprised with the following news: “Militants in Iraq have used $26 off-the-shelf software to intercept live video feeds from U.S. Predator drones, potentially providing them with information they need to evade or monitor U.S. military operations.” and then in 2012 Iran manages to intercept the communications controlling an US drone and gives it new instructions telling it to land in their country.
Can we learn anything from a decade of public history of drones? DARPA seems to have, maybe they are thinking of an angry drones game… maybe it is not a game.

On a recent announcement The Department of Defense, by way of their research arm DARPA, (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) are now fast at it to incorporate a smart-phone application that can control not just one unmanned drone — but swarms of drones linked through a smart system application as if they are one-minded. “DARPA is looking to tap the smartphone application development community with experience in application creation,” said Mark Rich, DARPA program manager.
According to Rich, “The rapid advancement and sophisticated capabilities in today’s smartphone technology provide opportunities to revolutionize the way sensor systems are developed and used. The integrated processing, storage, communications, navigation and orientation functions built into smartphone hardware and software can be leveraged to create far more powerful distributed sensor devices than we use today.”

AeroVironment video of flight tests of its Nano Hummingbird flapping-wing nano air vehicle, developed for DARPA. Battery-powered and remote-controlled, the hummingbird-like prototype uses flapping wings for propulsion and control. Carring a video camera and downlink…

Reality is that drones have been around for many decades now, collecting information, invading people’s private spaces and operating under secret directives that would surprise even those involved in some of those programs.
In North Dakota 2011, summoned by the sheriff, an unmanned Predator drone was used to get the Brossarts. Their alleged crime? They wouldn’t give back three cows and their calves that wandered onto their 3,000-acre farm this summer. These are the same aerial vehicles used by the CIA to track down and assassinate terrorists and militants in Pakistan and Afghanistan. These drones are now being deployed by different agencies to spy, harass, torture and more, on Americans, in their own backyards.
Convenient as it was 9=11 for the subsequent agreement of other nations to the deployment of drones against terrorism, so it is now the NDAA for their actions in US territory and abroad. I hope you are not on a list…

2012 and January’s dead animals

January 19 2011 by Editor in General |1 Comment

We started the year with thousands of birds falling from the skies in Arkansas, Louisiana, Kentucky, Missouri, California, Alabama, Italy and Sweden. Dead fish washing ashore in Maryland, Chicago, Brazil and New Zealand. Dead crabs also have been found in England and dead Octopus found in Portugal. Hundreds of cows have also been found dead in Wisconsin and these are the only things that are reported and we don’t really know the real extend of what might be going on in places that are more isolated from the news media or human contact, for example the deep seas.
I will try to explain how and why this is happening all over the world. Everything is connected in the Universe, animals represent our primal desires and are a form of life a little lesser than mankind. The places and the kind of animals and their colors also have specific meanings to different people and their beliefs. As the world focuses more on human basic carnal or material instincts and religions or beliefs search for a way to make their predictions or hopes come true, a lot of energy is focused and generated affecting these lower life forms. The earth is going through changes as can be explained by Milankovic’s cycles. Causing a distortion in the earth magnetic fields and the way the earth receives the energy that comes from the celestial bodies, specially the sun.
There seems to be also a occurrence in our solar system that has been affecting the outer planets as it was reported by NASA in the 1970′s. It is very strange that Pluto after being considered a planet for many years it is now what seems to be a mass of changing matter and gases. If the energy that is affecting Pluto, which by some has been called planet X or a brown dwarf, keeps approaching earth it is very possible that the effects of its magnetic field and its energy will turn Uranus into the same condition as Pluto is now. In a way we are losing gravity and not only the Universe has an important role to play but also the experiments being conducted by scientists and the military all over the world.
The fact that most of humanity is focused on 2012 as either a world changing event, or an end of the world apocalyptic crisis also puts a lot of energy on this date. There could also be plans at work to create a fictitious crisis to be utilized by the so called elite for world domination. Any way we look at it the facts are clear and we are at the crossroads of the future of humanity as we know it. It is up to humans to find some kind of convergence to avoid total human extinction. It is a very definite moment for the survival of the human race.
All of this analysis does not include the possibility of extra terrestrials amongst us or in different ways trying to control our destiny.
I do believe in extra terrestrial life, not just because of blind faith, but because there is plenty of evidence to back up those claims. I do not take into account their influence because it is not clear what their motives might be or how many intelligent (or not) races might be influencing in some way or another our lives. I see one important and most basic problem with the beliefs of human beings an that is the accepting of religions and the submission to “higher” powers and organizations without knowing exactly what the truth is.
Another variable in this equation is the most probable fact of time travel and their effects on what is going on. If my theory is right we are in a convergence where all of these energies, and different dimensions of existence will promptly meet in the near future. There are many other facts that sustain what I am writing here but it is not the scope of this article to cover them all. And the dead? And the orange alligator in Florida can also be explained…

Salt Water as gasoline, a green fuel

December 27 2010 by Editor in New Technologies |5 Comments

In 2007 Mr. Kansius discovered accidentally that salt water when subjected to a specific frequency would burn. This happened as he was searching for a treatment for cancer. John S. Kansius an American inventor, radio and TV engineer, one-time station owner and ham radio operator spent a lot of his money and time trying to refine his invention, unfortunately he died from complications brought on by chemotherapy which weakened his immune system and made him a victim of pneumonia. His legacy was taken up by other inventors, including Mr. Richard E. Smalley the discoverer of nano technology who also unfortunately died of cancer. As I looked deeper into the topic of this green fuel or gasoline, which would solve a lot of the energy and pollution problems we face today, I could not find a patent for the use or development of this technology. There where patent submissions by Mr. Kansius for cancer treatment but for some strange reason none of his discoveries with the use of salt water as a alternative fuel. During his experiments he was also able to light up a neon tube when placed under a certain frequency, and that remains me of Tesla’s discoveries relating to the free harnessing and distribution of energy or electricity. It seems that both discoveries have been hidden from public use and for the betterment of society. Who is behind the covering up of such technologies? As I ponder upon this question, one organization comes to mind, the Department of Energy.

For more information and the story of Mr. Kansius discoveries you can watch the following videos:

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image

Genetically engineering bacteria, viruses, animals, plants and humans

December 20 2010 by Editor in Experimentation on Humans, Genetically Modified Foods, Genetically Modified Species, Genetics, New Technologies |5 Comments

In 1972 Paul Berg engineered a bacteria from the monkey virus SV40 with that of the lambda virus. This was the beginning of the publicly known history of genetic engineering. Then genetic engineer Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty, working for General Electric, had developed a bacterium (derived from the Pseudomonas genus) capable of breaking down crude oil, which he proposed to use in treating oil spills. In 1980 They requested a patent from the US patent Office and it was rejected under the guise that the statutes  did not cover living organisms. The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences agreed with the original decision; however, the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals of the Supreme Court overturned the case allowing the organism to be patented.. Chief Justice Warren Burger said at the time that it was a small decision even though big issues were involved.  Seven years later the US Patent Office issued a one sentence decree, “You can patent anything in the world that is alive except a whole birth human being”.
This raises the following questions, can a human being that has not being born be patented? Someone else may own your genes, cell lines, tissues or even DNA sequence.

Some of the patents publicly known include patents on animal life, human life and food crops. In 1988, a Harvard University biologist was granted a patent for a mouse that had been engineered for increased susceptibility to cancer. The “Harvard Oncomouse” became the first animal to be considered an invention by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. It established a precedent within patent procedures for patenting genetically modified animals. Although this research was intended to benefit human health, the question remains about the ethics of patenting complex living beings. The U.S. Congress has never explicitly addressed the question of whether animal genes and cells can be corporate property. In 1976 a leukemia patient named John Moore had surgery at the University of California to remove his cancerous spleen. The University was later granted a patent for a cell line called “Mo,” removed from the spleen, which could be used for producing valuable proteins. The long term commercial value of the cell line was estimated at over one billion dollars. Mr. Moore demanded the return of the cells and control over his body parts, but the California Supreme Court decided that he was not entitled to any rights to his own cells after they had been removed from his body. What is most interesting about this case is that our DNA is contained in our cells.
American farmers and consumers throughout this century have fought against the inclusion of food crops under the patent laws. Corporate control over plant varieties themselves has been regarded as contrary to the interests of the general population. Patenting plant life has intensify the inequality between the developing and industrialized nations. The open exchange of seeds and plant material over the centuries has given the U.S. and Europe potatoes and tomatoes from Latin America, soybeans from China, and wheat, rye and barley from the Middle East, to name but a few. The developing world has never received compensation or recognition for these intellectual and technological contributions. Patenting plant life will exacerbate this inequality. While centuries of innovation by indigenous farmers have created most of the food crops grown today, the tinkering by agribusiness entitles them to claim a plant as their own invention, and receive all profits from its use. This “biocolonialism” will continue the pattern of a few transnational corporations profiting at the expense of large numbers of indigenous farmers.
The precursor of this technology warned about the potential dangers of recombinant genetic engineering in his landmark paper. Although the SV40 virus was thought to be innocuous in humans, the prospect of an altered form of the virus spreading through such a common bacterial agent as E. coli caused Berg to defer part of his research program. He did not insert the recombinant virus into bacterial cells as he originally planned. (With bacterial and animal genes, Herbert Boyer and Stanley Cohen took this step shortly.) A professor at Stanford University, in 1974 Berg published a widely discussed letter on the potential dangers of recombinant DNA research. Subsequently, a moratorium on research in 1975 provided time for regulations to be devised and put into effect in 1976.
It is unfortunate that this technology is widespread in the foods we eat. It also brings to mind that the appearance of AIDS around the same time frame and its link to two viruses that have been genetically modified.

 This was brought up by Dr. Segal who claims that AIDS is made up of the combination of the Visna virus which causes a lethal infection in sheep but that does not affect humans and HTLV-I. The Human T-lymphotropic virus Type I (HTLV-1) is a human RNA retrovirus that causes T-cell leukemia.
The question of Monsanto patenting pigs that still lingers seems to me is just a smoke screen since all of this jurisprudence and laws are still effective. So who might own you or anything else that is alive and what other organisms might have been created or modified without public knowledge?

Drones, unmmaned aerial vehicles

December 18 2010 by Editor in Drones, New Technologies |6 Comments

With the latest news about the crashing of a drone in El Paso, I feel compelled to write about drones and their use. Finally the Mexican government admitted to be the owner of the drone that crashed in El Paso. According to information regarding the crash, the drone was being used for surveillance in a joint operation between the US government and Mexican law enforcement. Details are not clear on exactly what this operation was, but it was probably related to drug law enforcement. When I first heard the news the probability of any one owning the device came to mind. Due to the availability in the black market of all kinds of weapons and the disregard of corporations for public safety it would be very probable that even the drug cartels could own such devices.

The drone in this case is an unmanned aerial vehicle and according to the information available it was unarmed. The vehicle has to be controlled by personnel and be directed to a target according to a plan or not. Drones are being used by many governments and according to their capabilities they can stay air bound for long periods of time. It would be very possible for drones to fly over countries and continents in combat or surveillance mode. They can carry lethal or non lethal payloads. Anything from modern missiles to biological weapons. In this world that we live in the possibility of a drone gone off course and causing grave damage to a civilian population is not far fetched.

The US has admitted of the use of drones in the Afghan war but and I know that they are being use in many parts of the american continent also for surveillance. MQ-1 Predator UAVs armed with Hellfire missiles are now used as platforms for hitting ground targets in sensitive areas. Armed Predators were first used in late 2001 from bases in Pakistan and Uzbekistan, mostly for hitting high profile individuals (terrorist leaders etc.’) inside Afghanistan. Since then, there were several reported cases of such attacks taking place in Pakistan, this time from Afghan-based Predators. The advantage of using an unmanned vehicle, rather than a manned aircraft in such cases, is to avoid a diplomatic embarrassment should the aircraft be shot down and the pilots captured, since the bombings took place in countries deemed friendly and without the official permission of those countries.

There is a benign side to the use of these aircraft which include search and rescue, damage assessment and possible terrorism deterrence. There are manufacturers all over the world and the US and Israel were the first to develop the technology. US manufactures have the 60% of the market being Northrop Grumman and General Atomics the dominant manufacturers in this industry. The primary drones in used today manufactured by US companies are the United States Air Force Global Hawk unmanned reconnaissance aircraft and the Predator. The Global Hawk is primarily a reconnaissance drone while the predator can not only function as such but can also carry lethal and nonlethal payloads.

The Gay Bomb

December 16 2010 by Editor in Electronic Harassment, Experimentation on Humans, Mind Control, New Technologies, Sexual Slaves |4 Comments

[ad#Banner]

In the 1970s or earlier the Air Force experimented with a new idea of creating a Gay Bomb, this consisted in making the enemy so attracted to each other that they would not fight but be irresistible to their own force. Through the time I have lived I’ve been amazed at the presence of so many gay men, increasingly through the years, since we know now the world has been a place for experimentation with anything from nuclear power plants to experiments with monkeys I have become convinced that this so called “Gay Bomb” was tried here on some of its population. We know have information of many chemicals that people are in contact with, on a daily basis, which can also affect the virility of man.
In 1994 the Wright Laboratory in Ohio produced a three-page proposal on a variety of possible nonlethal chemical weapons, which was later obtained—complete with marginal jottings and typos—by the Sunshine Project through a Freedom of Information Act request. In the 1970s body spray advertisers claimed that their products contained human sexual pheromones which act as an aphrodisiac. “Copulins” were patented as products which release human pheromones, based on research on rhesus monkeys. Androstenone, axillary sweat, and “vomodors” have been claimed to act as human pheromones. Despite these claims, no pheromonal substance has ever been demonstrated to directly influence human behavior in a peer reviewed study. In documents leaked the possibility was canvassed that a strong aphrodisiac could be dropped on enemy troops, ideally one which would also cause “homosexual behavior”. The documents described the aphrodisiac weapon as “distasteful but completely non-lethal”
There is also technology supporting the fact that these weapons are being used against many people. Body odor remote-engineering, such as halitosis and hyperhidrosis, was another possibility discussed. Again, these effects are produced by a non-lethal chemical weapon—possibly one that would affect the hormonal and digestive systems. It appears that a ‘heavy sweating bomb’, ‘flatulence bomb’ and ‘halitosis bomb’ are also being utilized at the time. One of the uses is to make an enemy so smelly they could be quite literally sniffed out of hiding by their opponents. It was also considered fairly damaging to the enemy’s morale.
The case is that sexual smells are being used to stimulate and create a sexual desire remotely, also other odors to pretend that the person you are in love with is going through the same desires or that you have a connection so strong that makes you think that you are going through the same experience.
Wright Laboratory won the 2007 Ig Nobel Peace Prize for “instigating research & development on a chemical weapon—the so-called ‘gay bomb’ / ‘poof bomb’ —that will make enemy soldiers become sexually irresistible to each other. However, Air Force personnel contacted were not willing to attend the award ceremony at Harvard University’s Sanders Theater to accept the award in person. This is additional proof that the research was carried through and that it is being utilized. The use on civilians is basically to create sexual attraction or repulsion and also for harassment.

For additional information you can visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_bomb

It is important to remember that there is many good people in the Air Force, the military and other parts of government but these weapons go against freedom and are being utilized not only to control but harass innocent persons and even children.

Genetic Experimentation

December 13 2010 by Editor in Experimentation on Humans, Genetically Modified Foods, Genetically Modified Species, Genetics, New Technologies |4 Comments

It is a fact that many countries have been experimenting and creating new breeds by genetic engineering. It began with plants, then animals, humans and now between all three. It is well known of the various plants that have been modified to produce more, have a better looking fruit or even not produce seeds and resist pesticides. Americans already eat modified corn, potatoes and other crops. Soon to come are the first such animals: disease-resistant shrimp, meatier chickens and fast-growing salmon. Thanks to mouse DNA, a new pig produces a less harmful manure. New crops include a rice, mixed with daffodil DNA, that includes more nutrients. Here are some examples of GMO’s that have been grown in the United States:
Rat and human genes in trout, spider genes in goats, human genes in corn or rice, mouse and human genes in potatoes, fish genes in tomatoes, cow or human genes in salmon and human liver gene in rice.
A few years back Monsanto applied to patent pigs, it is not clear if it received the ownership of pigs but that doesn’t stop them from proceeding with the alteration of the pig genome and the genome of any other living organism and their commercialization. Sometimes the way patents are described and presented can disguise or confuse the meaning behind them. Here are two interesting patents:
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=eGsEAAAAEBAJ
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=2z-WAAAAEBAJ

[ad#Banner]

A renowned Russian biologist, Il’ya Ivanovich Ivanov, gained great fame and national acclaim in the 1900′s with his work on artificially inseminating horses, increasing the number of horses that could be bred by a factor of about twenty. For a preindustrialized nation, this was a tremendous economic accomplishment. Primarily funded by the Veterinary Department of the Russian Interior Ministry, Ivanov carried this technology to its next logical step, the creation of specialized hybrid animals for agricultural and industrial purposes, as well as for the sake of advancing the science. His artificial insemination experiments successfully crossed many closely related species: donkeys and zebras, mice and rats and other rodents, birds, and various species of cattle.
In 1910, Ivanov lectured on crossing humans and apes, citing artificial insemination as the method of choice due to prevailing ethical objections to, well, interspecies partying, for lack of a better term. Ivanov’s work came to an abrupt halt in 1917 with the Russian Revolution, which effectively dissolved most existing government programs and eliminated all of his funding.
In 1924 Ivanov’s presented a grant proposal and a year later he set off for Africa to set up a new lab. After some false starts, he finally launched his own facility in Guinea with chimpanzees netted for him by local hunters. Using sperm from an unidentified man, Ivanov made three artifical insemination attempts on his female chimps. Because Ivanov observed that the local Africans viewed chimps as inferior humans, and viewed humans who had had contact with chimps as tainted, he performed these inseminations in secret with only his son present as an assistant. Ivanov knew that a mere three attempts was inadequate to hope for any success, but the difficulties and expenses of maintaining and inseminating the chimps was too great. So he conceived a more sustainable experimental technique: Collecting the sperm of only two or three male apes, and then using that to artificially inseminate human women.
He found no support for his plan in Africa — in large part because he had proposed to inseminate women in hospitals without their knowledge or consent — so he returned to the Soviet Union with his remaining chimps and founded a primate station in Sukhum (today called Sukhumi) on the Black Sea. Only one mature male survived, an orangutan named Tarzan. By 1929, the plan was to have five women be artificially inseminated, and then live at Ivanov’s institute with a gynecologist for one full year. But just as the first woman volunteer was secured, known only to history as “G”, Tarzan died. Ivanov ordered five male chimps, but just as they were delivered, his life suddenly turned in a new direction, driven by the constant turmoil of philosophies and favoritisms in the Soviet Union. Ivanov was accused of sabotaging the Soviet agricultural system and various political crimes, leading to his arrest a few months later. G never visited the Sukhum station, and no sperm was ever harvested from the new chimps. Ivanov died after two years of exile.
Ivanov’s primate station survived, however, and became his only real legacy. By the 1960′s it had over two thousand apes and monkeys, and was employed by the Soviet and American space programs. But nobody ever followed his ape-human hybrid research there, though conventional artificial insemination was often employed among its primate population.

In 2005, the Scottish newspaper The Scotsman reported the following:
The Soviet dictator Josef Stalin ordered the creation of Planet of the Apes-style warriors by crossing humans with apes, according to recently uncovered secret documents. Moscow archives show that in the mid-1920s Russia’s top animal breeding scientist, Ilya Ivanov, was ordered to turn his skills from horse and animal work to the quest for a super-warrior. It is not known with certainty if these were or not Stalin’s plans and it is clear that it fits perfectly with Nazi philosophy of a perfect race. Although the method of artificial insemination is an old technology with the new advances in genetic engineering and gene splicing it is a fact that humans can be modified for different special reasons and purposes.

There are no laws to protect us from the government or any private or public enterprise from the experimentation or modification of us as human beings in fact there are laws that protect the Department of Defense when experimenting on human subjects without their consent. Although the law is written in a way that seems to protect us from such experimentation it does the contrary. Here is one of the laws and a clear explanation on the deception is being applied to people:

U.S. Law Allows Testing of Chemicals and Biological Agents on “Civilian Population”
Quote:
PUBLIC LAW 105—85—NOV. 18, 1997: USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS

SEC. 1078. RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS.

(a) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)

(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.

(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:

(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.

So section (a) prohibits these cruel and inhumane chemical and biological tests on humans.
Then section (b) says that the prohibitions in section (a) do not apply to tests carried out for virtually any purpose. So section (b) completely negates the prohibitions of section (a).

In Other Words:
The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans for nearly any purpose they desire.

The Following Should Also Be Noted
The term “biological agent” as stated above in (a)(1) is defined in (e) as follows:
Quote:
(e) BIOLOGICAL AGENT DEFINED.—In this section, the term
‘‘biological agent’’ means any micro-organism (including bacteria,
viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance,
and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized
component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance,
whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable
of causing—
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a
human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or
materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.

In Other Words:
The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans that cause death, biological malfunction, and deleterious alteration of the environment. The term “deleterious alteration of the environment” brings chemtrails to mind.

Read about actual human chemical testing programs currently in operation:

http://herballure.com/chemtrails

Read the full text of this law here. Page 287 contains the above excerpt.:
Public Law 105-85

Informed Consent

Some argue that none of this activity can be conducted without “informed consent”, as stated in section (c), which reads:
Quote:
(c) INFORMED CONSENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense
may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.

Although section (c) seems to provide some protection for us in that it requires us to be notified “in advance” if this “testing” is to take place, in reality, it does not provide any protection at all.

Why not?

Because you’ve already been “informed in advance” and you’ve already given your “consent”.

Because this “law” is publicly available for everyone to read, you have been “informed”. Because you have not contested it (that’s what the courts are for), you have provided your “consent”.

This law is part of a contract between you and the government. When the terms of a contract are known and uncontested, it’s called “acquiescence”. Acquiescence essentially means that both parties are in agreement.

Acquiesce: “submit or comply silently or without protest”

So, when this law was published, you were “informed”. Because you have not challenged it in court, you have “consented”. By your own inaction, you have said, “Sure, go ahead and poison me, even if it causes death. I have no problem with it.”

Because this contract meets the judicial requirements of “remedy” and “recourse”, it is legally binding.

Judges like to say: “Ignorance of the law is no excuse”. They say this because you are expected to know all of the “law” because it is publicly available for you to read (despite the fact that this is humanly impossible).

So, in reality, section (c) is legally useless. It does not provide any additional protection, it only “seems” to. Section (c)’s only purpose for being included in this law is deception, nothing more.

Deception

Section (c) of this “law” is very deceptive because most people don’t understand the concepts of acquiescence in contract law, therefore, people mistakenly conclude that this “testing” will never happen to them unless they are informed about it.

The powers-that-be play upon public ignorance by inducing people into having a false sense of security. As a result, the public believes this activity could not be occurring because they believe that they would have personally heard about it. This false belief then provides insurance that this law will never be contested in court, and as long as this law remains uncontested, chemtrail spraying will continue unhindered.

The final result is that this craftily-written law has done its job. It has enabled chemtrail spraying to continue without being contested in court. Additionally, this law continually provides legal protection for those doing the spraying. After all, by your inaction you have given them your permission.

When you consider the incredibly dark nature of this deception and when you consider the fact that this law gives your public servants the self-appointed power to kill you, you should then consider what kind of people are running your country, or the world for that matter.

The law and its explanation of the deception was taken from http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=45

It is important to remember that there are good people everywhere and it is only a very few that are using this technologies and laws to attempt to accomplish their goals. The implications of new technologies and the ties to governments and law makers make it very difficult to protect ourselves against the invasion of our most sacred parts.

The Bush and the Nazis

December 7 2010 by Editor in Electronic Harassment, Mind Control, New Technologies |3 Comments

Mr. Prescott Bush was the banker for the Nazi party in NY and held close ties to the Nazi war machine, a generational legacy of crime and deception. His business dealings continued until his company’s assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act. Mr. Prescott worked for and profited from companies closely involved with the very German businesses that financed Hitler’s rise to power. It has also been suggested that the money he made from these dealings helped to establish the Bush family fortune and set up its political dynasty.
After the fall of Germany in the second world war the project paper clip help bring Nazis to the US. There were thousands of scientists, including Werhner von Braun who help put NASA in space. Among the Nazis brought to the US were intelligence personnel that were assimilated into the OSS to form what is now called the CIA. With the incorporation of the Nazis to the intelligence services of the US, Great Britain and Russia they brought their knowledge and plans to perpetuate a one world government. The inhuman treatment they have used on their people and others during the war would then take a much wider scope.
The similarities between the use of propaganda, terrorism and mind control to achieve their goals can be clearly seen in our world today. The Nazis didn’t lose the war they just relocated. There is also evidence of the scape of very important scientists and Nazis leaders to different places in the world. A plan with the code name ODESSA help them to relocate, there was also close ties between the Vatican and the duration of Nazi rule of Germany. There is also information of Dr. Mengele being in Brazil for a time, but also in the US leading a mind control project which still in existence today.
There is also a connection between the Bush family and the infamous Skull and Bones, a very secretive society at Yale University,both Prescott and George H.W. were graduates of Yale and belonged to Skull and Bones. Included in the mysteries surrounding Skull and Bones there are sexual acts to create bonding, the existence of Geronimo’s bones in its premises and the use of occult practices to try to achieve their goals in all walks of life. These include political, financial and religious control.
In 1953, George H.W. Bush got money from Brown Brothers Harriman and, with partners Hugh and Bill Liedtke, formed Zapata Petroleum. By the late 1950s they were millionaires. Bush bought subsidiary Zapata Off-Shore from his partners and went into business on his own in 1954 at this time he started his connection with the Bin Laden family. By 1958, the new company was drilling on the Cay Sal Bank in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico. These islands had been leased to Nixon supporter and CIA contractor Howard Hughes the previous year and were later used as a base for CIA raids on Cuba. The CIA was using companies like Zapata to stage and supply secret missions attacking Fidel Castro’s Cuban government in advance of the Bay of Pigs invasion. The CIA’s codename for that invasion was “Operation Zapata.” In 1981, all Securities and Exchange Commission filings for Zapata Off-Shore between 1960 and 1966 were destroyed. In other words, the year Bush became vice president, important records detailing his years at his drilling company disappeared. In 1969, Zapata bought the United Fruit Company of Boston, another company with strong CIA connections.
George H.W. Bush served Gerald Ford’s Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) from November 1975 to January 1977. As head the CIA, Bush was answerable only to President Ford. He was supposedly the first CIA “outsider” to hold the agency’s top position. During his tenure as DCI he maintained a policy of disinformation and secrecy, despite a public show of cooperation with congressional investigations of CIA abuses such as assassination plots using Mafia hit men. In September 1976, Chilean dissident leader Orlando Letelier was assassinated in Washington D.C. by agents of DINA, Chile’s secret police. The CIA knew of such plots, and the two assassins entered the U.S. using fake Paraguayan passports. But the FBI was kept in the dark about this information.
There are also reports of the presence of George H.W. Bush in Dallas during the time of Kennedy’s assassination, there is a photograph which clearly shows him and is alleged to have being taken that same day at the same place were Kennedy was shot.
His son George W. Bush continued the Bush dynasty also graduating from Yale and belonging to Skull and Bones. He became president of the US as his father did and was under his rule that the 911 incident happened. The war against terrorism took a new meaning during this time and he was responsible for taking more of our liberties away. This also lead to the conflicts that we still have going on in Irak and Afghanistan, which have also created great instability and stress on the people of those countries and in our troops, making it even more difficult to protect our homeland from a possible invasion. Another important fact is that George W. Bush brother was the owner of the security company that was to protect the Twin Towers before the 911 attacks. It is an interesting fact that Jeb Bush was not a graduate of Yale University, and that he never had a clear run for the Presidency of the US. Another fact is the well known fraud that occurred during the elections in Florida were the outcome was the loss of the presidency by Al Gore even though he had the popular vote.
Today we are presented with the dilemma of a government divided by secrecy, run by people that have in their priorities the mind control of everyone to achieve their goals. The agencies are compartmentalized and only a few have knowledge of the aims of the proposed one world government thought out by the Nazi regime and brought to the US and other countries by the Bush family, the Vatican and the Rothschilds. The three powers to control the mind, finances and resources of the earth, it all has been called the Reptilian agenda. The bloodlines to control the religions, the minds, the military and the destiny of our world.

Nazis, CIA and Mind Control Technology

December 1 2010 by Editor in Electronic Harassment, Mind Control, New Technologies, Sexual Slaves |5 Comments

[ad#Banner]

The United States Government, Nazi Scientists, and Project Paperclip, 1945 to 1990, the OSS, the CIA (its successor), and several other U.S. government agencies began the “Paperclip,” “National Interest” and “63″ classified projects close to the end of World War II. These highly secretive projects were designed to covertly recruit thousands of Nazi scientists (some of whom were documented war criminals), whitewash their records, and then relocate them to new homes in America, with the understanding that the recruits would then share their technology with the U.S. government.

The technologies that these Nazi recruits shared with the U.S. government included rocketry, which eventually became the basis of the Nazi-created NASA program, and “trauma-based mind control”.

The well-documented working partnership between sadistic Nazi war criminals and OSS/CIA employees and officers may explain why most older government mind-control survivors in North America have related chilling accounts of having been forcibly exposed, by CIA employees and contractors, to sadistic Nazis during the child victims’ forced participation in the CIA’s experimental mind-control programs…including, but not limited to, MKULTRA.  These particular crimes against humanity, perpetrated jointly by government employees and contractors, and Nazi war criminals, against innocent civilians, continue to be one of the U.S. government’s most shameful secrets.

For more information about Nazi & CIA joint mind control technology and brutal experimentation on North American civilians, including children, see Carol Rutz’s book, A Nation Betrayed:The Chilling True Story of Secret Cold War Experiments Performed on Our Children and Other Innocent People, and Dr. Colin Ross’s Bluebird: Deliberate Creation of Multiple Personality By Psychiatrists.

Trauma & Dissociation

Now, listening to a record over and over may be a lot of fun, but it’s not the most significant physical stimulus available to us. Extremes of pleasure and pain may go well beyond that, triggering far greater physiological responses and long-term effects. Imagine instead of listening to a record over and over again, you are severely beaten repeatedly, or subjected to electric shocks. And at varying intervals to this, you are in turn sexually abused. Maybe this goes on for months or years. It’s not very difficult to imagine that such events would seriously contort your psyche in unimaginable ways. Especially if these things were combined and overlaid with other types of classical and operant conditioning.

Technically, dissociation is a mental process which produces a lack of connection in a person’s thoughts, memories, feelings, actions, or sense of identity. When a person is dissociating, certain information is not associated with other information as it normally would be. For example, during a traumatic experience, a person may dissociate the memory of the place and circumstances of the trauma from his ongoing memory, resulting in a temporary mental escape from the fear and pain of the trauma and, in some cases, a memory gap surrounding the experience. Because this process can produce changes in memory, people who frequently dissociate often find their senses of personal history and identity are affected.

Dissociative disorders develop under fairly consistent circumstances. When faced with overwhelmingly traumatic situations from which there is no physical escape, a child may resort to “going away” in his or her head. This ability is typically used by children as an extremely effective defense against acute physical and emotional pain, or anxious anticipation of that pain. By this dissociative process, thoughts, feelings, memories, and perceptions of the traumatic experiences can be separated off psychologically, allowing the child to function as if the trauma had not occurred.

Dissociation is often referred to as a highly creative survival technique because it allows individuals enduring “hopeless” circumstances to preserve some areas of healthy functioning. Over time, however, for a child who has been repeatedly physically and sexually assaulted, defensive dissociation becomes reinforced and conditioned. Because the dissociative escape is so effective, children who are very practiced at it may automatically use it whenever they feel threatened or anxious — even if the anxiety-producing situation is not abusive. Often, even after the traumatic circumstances are long past, the left-over pattern of defensive dissociation remains

Also interesting are the post’s comments, wherein it is suggested that 9/11 was “a trigger to an alter personality in the collective American psyche.”  Which leads me to wonder if the U.S.’s torture regime is not designed to get accurate information–a purpose for which torture is increasingly known to be ineffective–but to coerce obedience, including as a veiled threat to American citizens.  Or if it was designed at all.

Dissociation is commonly experienced during trauma. Rape and traffic accident survivors describe out-of-body experiences during which they float above their bodies and watch terrifying activities transpire below. This experience occurs naturally, whether the actual trauma is a fluke occurrence or a calculated torture session.

Classical Conditioning is the type of learning made famous by Pavlov’s experiments with dogs. The gist of the experiment is this: Pavlov presented dogs with food, and measured their salivary response (how much they drooled). Then he began ringing a bell just before presenting the food. At first, the dogs did not begin salivating until the food was presented. After a while, however, the dogs began to salivate when the sound of the bell was presented. They learned to associate the sound of the bell with the presentation of the food. As far as their immediate physiological responses were concerned, the sound of the bell became equivalent to the presentation of the food.

My programming involved fragmentation into alters who were trained as sex agents, couriers, computers, and cult alters (priestess, seeker, caller, whore, slave, trainer, etc.). Some of my alters were trained to handle weapons. The stories of Kathleen Sullivan, Brice Taylor, Cisco Wheeler, and Claudia Mullen, as well as Cathy O’Brien’s TranceFormation of America describe much that is familiar to me, including near-death centers and ‘hunting.’ I would like to thank each of these women for speaking out. I deeply admire your courage.

It is important to remember that there are good people everywhere and it is only a very few that are using this network of mind controlled people to attempt to accomplish their goals.

Sexual Slaves and Mind Control

November 30 2010 by Editor in Electronic Harassment, Mind Control, Sexual Slaves |1 Comment

Continuing the series on Mind Control and Electronic Harassment this article contains information relating to the use of sex in the purpose of world control by the programmers and masters. The choosing of trainees is based on their Genetics and Dissociative Abilities, Availability, Mental and Physical Features. The levels are many and the ways used vary. Here are some of the examples of sexual slaves and their duties as part of the organization, called the network, created by a few to deceive and control people.

The use of slaves crosses many organizational boundaries within the overall Network. If a slave is to be used as a Delta model (assassination), they may be selected for strength and dexterity. The Delta Force is the army’s elite unit made up of Monarch slaves.

If they are to operate as a Beta model (sexual slave), they will be chosen if they can master technique. Occasionally they might in some circumstances be selected for how pretty the programmers expect the child to become. Some parents have produced good looking children and are actually sought-after to bear children to sell into the Mind Controlled Slavery “Freedom Train” System.

However, vastly more important for Beta Sex Slaves are their ability to be programmed to have charm, seductive skills, charisma, and creativity. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and the programmers can put almost any kind of body to use as a sex slave.

Almost any sex slave can fit somewhere into the script of the Illuminati/New World Order/crime syndicate “porn” movies. (I place porn in quotation marks–because what they call porn doesn’t resemble what the public thinks of porn—we’re not talking Playboy type porn, we’re talking ghastly horrible atrocities that are as sick as anything done in the Nazi concentration camps). For instance, it takes little acting ability or beauty to have one’s head chopped off while having sex.

There are different types of sexual slaves, but the Illuminati wants to get Beta alters which are sharp, talented, skilled, and resourceful. They will use these Beta alters, such as the Black Widow alters, for espionage and blackmail.

To make sure that the child’s mind develops properly, the baby will be interacted with so that those areas of the brain that are important to develop will develop to the maximum. It is a well-known fact, that areas of the brain grow according to how much stimulation and use that area of the brain receives. For this reason, Grande Dames, who are involved in programming, will spend time drawing and showing faces to the child and seeing if the child can recognize identical faces. Almost any other item will be used, candy canes with stripes (match the candy canes with the same no. of stripes), trees, or pencils. The child must learn to match identical items very early–even before they can speak. This is so they will be able to build mirror images into their mind.

It is important to remember that there are good people everywhere and it is only a very few that are using this network of mind controlled people to attempt to accomplish their goals.

[ad#Banner]

Next Page »